TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RX366

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX366
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 21:33:05 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I just spent a few minutes doing an A/B comparison of an original
subrx (in 566) with a RX-366 subrx (in 565).  I used a delta loop
antenna to listen to 9MHz SWL band and a 580ft Beverage antenna to
listen to AM BCB.  Bottom line, there's no comparison - in these two
instances, original subrx hears MUCH better than the RX-366.

So if you only use your subrx for SWL'ing or AM BCB, stick with the
original subrx.  If you actually use your subrx for ham radio, the
RX-366 will be a HUGE improvement.

73,
Barry N1EU

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there's interest, I may have the opportunity in the next few days
> to do a head-to-head comparison between original subrx and RX-366 on
> general coverage bands to answer this (at least for myself) once and
> for all.
>
> 73, Barry N1EU
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Rick W <ve7tk@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> I guess my RX-366 is broken because it hears on general receive?  ... and 
>> WWV as well?
>>
>> 73,
>> Rick
>> VE7TK
>>
>> Website: http://www.ve7tk.com
>>
>> To:Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Subject:Re: [TenTec] RX366
>> From:John Occhipinti <k3ur@att.net>
>> Reply-to:Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Date:Fri, 17 May 2013 19:46:05 -0400
>> List-post:<tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
>> Ray, are you saying that you lose the general coverage capability on the 
>> Orion
>> II, when you install the DX366? Thanks for your input. John, K3UR
>> Net Control, TEN-TEC Nets Sent from my iPad On May 17, 2013, at 12:40 PM, 
>> Rsoifer@aol.com wrote: >I can see why a serious contester would want the 
>> RX366 but  as a DXer who  >just fools around in contests and doesn't do 
>> SO2R, I  personally don't feel  >the need for it.  I would rather not give 
>> up  general coverage, which I use  >for WWV, KPH/KSM, Armed Forces Day, etc. 
>>  I  do run the v3 firmware for my  >566, and find the SAF feature very  
>> helpful. > >73 Ray W2RS
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>