TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor

To: <k9yc@arrl.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor
From: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:59:29 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jim,

You've not heard my audio, nor seen it, but you already have an opinion. Why not look at my original comments as to how the combination was produced.


73 ES DX,
Gary -- AB9M

-----Original Message----- From: Jim Brown
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:54 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor

On 6/14/2013 4:37 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
I tend to agree that running an external speech processor AND the internal processor at the same time would not seem be the better configuration.

Right. This is an example of "more is NOT better." There's enough bad
audio on the air -- why add more?

A good rule of thumb is no more than about 10dB indicated compression on
peaks. More than that quickly starts to get nasty.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>