| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution |
| From: | Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:43:15 -0400 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Why a 1:1 when I am using open line with a 600 ohm impedance? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2013, at 4:44 PM, "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote: > Because it is 4:1. > You are better off with a 1:1 balun. > > For a better understanding of this, see Steve's page on Tuner Balun: 4:1or > 1:1? > Here: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/tuner_balun/ > > 73 > Rick, DJ0IP > > -----Original Message----- > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Steve Hunt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Richards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Robert Mcgraw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |