Steve,
Since you're our "guinea pig" on this one, are you willng to try putting some
wax on the line and then re-running the wet vs. dry tests to see if that
makes any difference as some claim? Although I'm not sure what kind of wax to
recommend, I did find this reference to using "boat or airplane high
dielectric wax" on window line:
<snip> I used to coat my ladderline (the punched 300 or 450 ohm ribbon) with a
layer of boat or airplane high dielectric wax. And it did make a difference
in the NE winters. <snip>
eHam: KE3WD Nov QST Ladder Line loss Reply #13
http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php?topic=44059.0
TNX/73, Al
On Thu August 1 2013 10:19:10 am Steve Hunt wrote:
> Problem solved .... I think.
>
> Just added some wetting agent - washing up liquid - to the water and
> re-sprayed. Losses jumped to 5dB/100ft at 26MHz!
>
> Steve G3TXQ
>
> On 01/08/2013 14:58, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> > Steve,
> >
> > I hope you document the test on your web site.
> > It is extremely useful for people.
> >
> > I'm afraid papers like Wes' scare people away from using commercial
> > window line and most people are afraid to build their own operwire line,
> > so in the end many people miss out on the benefits of using this type of
> > feedline.
> >
> > 73
> > Rick, DJ0IP
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|