TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 13:30:52 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I think the thing to remember about rx antennas like small loops is that, while some of the noise may have a preferred polarization and small loops may provide some polarization isolation, they mostly reduce noise because of their directional characteristics. While they have very low efficiency, that's not a problem for rx purposes. If we assume that the noise comes equally form all directions because a loop has such sharp nulls means that the noise in those nulls is heavily attenuated while the desired signal isn't. If there is a particular noise source (that's not in the direction of your desired signal) adjusting the loop to null that source may be even more beneficial.

Kim N5OP

On 9/22/2013 12:46 PM, Spencer wrote:
I almost gave up SWL in metropolitan areas outside
the USA. I made a small multi-turn loop using FLAT
4 conductor telephone wire and resonated with a BCB capacitor. A small ferrite bead on one of the wires to couple to the radio. Very narrow band but almost noise free.
Spencer W1GAK
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>