| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops. |
| From: | geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:04:43 +0300 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 10/16/2013 7:49 PM, Paul Harker wrote: Considering the high price of the parts versus the "street value" of the radio, would you be better off bypassing the blown finals and either selling or using it as a QRP rig?Mike et al, Where I stand/sit/hop right now: Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson 4X1GM/N3OWJ Jerusalem Israel. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops., Paul Harker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops., Floyd Rodgers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops., Paul Harker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops., Mike Bryce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |