TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two

To: Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:40:02 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 10/31/2013 11:51 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
Please help me out here

I've done my best, both in the RFI tutorial and in the Power Point on coaxial chokes that are on my website.

Throughout, you insist on using the word "balun" with some qualifying adjective. Why use the word "balun" at all? It is clearly inadequate to describe the device in question, and is a major obstacle to understanding.

If what we want is a common mode choke, we should CALL it a common mode choke. Then we realize that we must understand what it does in the common mode circuit to understand how it works and what its limitations are. When we call it a current balun, we don't know what it is or how it acts -- 99.9% of hams view it as a mysterious black box.

If what we want is a half wave of transmission line to go from the feedpoint of one side of a dipole driven element to the other, we should call it a half wave of transmission line, because that's what it is. And when we CALL it what it really is, we understand how it works, and we understand that it only works at the frequency where it is a half wave.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>