To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters |
From: | Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | n4py3@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 09 Nov 2013 17:14:15 -0500 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
That's a new one on me. How could loss be less with high SWR on a short
length of coax? It makes no sense.
Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com On 11/9/2013 5:07 PM, Steve Hunt wrote: Interestingly, when using *short* lengths of coax the loss can be lower at high SWR than when it's matched. For example, 10ft of RG213 has a matched loss at 1.9MHz of 0.03dB; but terminated with 500 Ohms (SWR=10:1) the loss is only 0.012dB - less than half. For a 2500 Ohm load (SWR=50:1) the loss is 0.046 - only 50% above the matched case. It's only true for high impedance loads and short lengths, where only a small portion of the standing wave pattern exists; but they could be the conditions in this case. Steve G3TXQ On 09/11/2013 21:10, Carl Moreschi wrote:How much coax did you add? The main idea of open wire line is it is much less lossy than coax at high SWR's. You therefore want to keep the coax portion is short as practical. The SWR on the feedline could be 100 to 1 or even higher. Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |