TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters

To: k9yc@arrl.net, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters
From: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Reply-to: rmcgraw@blomand.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:45:22 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Here's the rules that apply:

The longer the feed line on a given line......the more loss.
The higher the SWR on a given line.......the more loss.
The higher the frequency on a given line.....the more loss.

Add these together.......the more loss.

Choose your combination.

73
Bob, K4TAX



;

> On 11/9/2013 2:37 PM, Joel Hallas wrote:
>> At VHF, depending on cable type, the dielectric loss gets more
>> important, and will have a larger influence
>
> Actually, if you "do the sums," you find that dielectric loss is barely
> beginning to be a factor well above 500 MHz in most cables that aren't
> "broken"  -- for example, full of water.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


--
Disclosure:
I am a Tentec Ambassador and compensated according to the Tentec
Ambassador plan. I serve as a volunteer beta test person for the Omni
VII, Eagle and Argonaut VI products.   Otherwise, I hold no business or
employment interest with Tentec.

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>