| To: | tentec@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 137, Issue 51 | 
| From: | Spencer <k5gak@powerc.net> | 
| Reply-to: | k5gak@powerc.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Date: | Fri, 23 May 2014 10:48:58 -0600 | 
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Most antennas I've seen are a compromise. The auto tuner I use does a 
pretty good job of
providing a 50Ω non-reactive load for the 50Ω coax. I use a balun that 
gives 1:1, 4:1 or
1:4 from W2FMI to make the job for the tuner easier. Efficiency is 
another question.
All that stuff is in a box now that my crankir has finally arrived, no 
matching device of any kind is required just the twist of 2 knobs. 73 Spencer W1GAK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship, Jim Brown | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc., R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW via TenTec | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 137, Issue 51, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP | 
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Original O II sub rx, Kim Elmore | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |