TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4

from [Jim Brown] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 12:36:18 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
On Sat,12/5/2015 11:58 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:

The same thing has crossed my mind Jack.  Or given the stampede to SDR
rigs, class D boxes, the latest XQP3000 rig blah blah, there won't be
anyone left who can converse and understand all vacuum tube gear.


Aside from keeping boat-anchors running, exactly why does that matter?

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4, Rob Atkinson
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Model 544 (or that era) part source needed, Paul Christensen
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4, Rob Atkinson
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4, Kim Elmore
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]