Exactly in plain English what is wrong with the 7300
Paul kw4bd
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Barry,
>
> I don't disagree that all mfrs are looking at direct sampling RX, and I agree
> that they should be. I'd call that wise investment in R&D. My assessment of
> the 7300 is that it's a budget level product that was oversold.
>
> The fundamental issue right now with that technology is dynamic range with
> the available chips, which are in the right price range because of the volume
> built for them by cell phones. Guys are making Flex 6700s work in contest
> superstations because the serious bandpass filtering they would need with any
> radio acts as an RX preselector, limiting the bandwidth of the spectrum that
> can overload the A/D. But that won't help in EU or AS, where broadcasters are
> in the passband of any practical filter on 40M, and there are some high power
> broadcasters close enough to 20M to make it a problem there too.
>
> I think you've been happy with your ANAN in that regard. Are you doing
> anything special to address the dynamic range issue?
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>> On Mon,8/15/2016 5:22 AM, Barry N1EU wrote:
>> I think dealers and manufacturers have stock piles of ALL superhets, not
>> just the 7600. I think Rick is on the mark that the DEALER is simply
>> motivated to move excess 7600 inventory.
>>
>> What Rick didn't mention is that there's a fresh rumor making the rounds
>> that Icom is about to announce a direct sampling SDR replacement for the
>> 7600. That's extra motivation to move 7600 inventory.
>>
>> The 7300 has changed the game, period. Icom is sitting pretty.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|