Thank you for at least suggesting that there might be an answer.
Even so, 20 to 30 dB over 96 is not enough, that’s still only 128 dB, and a
good analog receiver can be better than that.
Good luck with your articles. I am asking for a lifetime membership for this
Christmas. Then I can read more current technical info since I am retiring from
any regular work in 14 months.
73
Gary
> On Sep 11, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun,9/11/2016 2:04 PM, Gary J FollettDukes HiFi wrote:
>> I understand and appreciate this discussion of NOISE dynamic range. This
>> does not explain how one can get SIGNAL dynamic range higher than ~96 dB
>> with 16 bits. These are different quantities.
>>
>> If the A to D has say, 1 mV per bit response, then the largest input signal
>> this 16 bit A to D can measure should be ~65,000 mV. That’s about 96 dB.
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> I worked in pro audio, and thought the same thing you have stated here. But
> there's far more to it than that -- it's not a simple A/D, it's a far more
> complex (and very different) circuit. My neighbor NR0V, who developed the
> "Pure Signal" distortion cancelling system, went through it with me. I'm not
> a digital guy, so I don't remember details. But the bottom line is that these
> systems get another 20-30 dB more dynamic range than for a simple A/D. I'm
> sure that if we had time, you or I could learn a lot about it by poking
> around the internet. :) Someday I probably will, but my plate is currently
> full working on an update for several chapters of the ARRL Handbook. And when
> I finish with that, I'm sure the XYL will have something for me to do. :)
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|