Rick:
Sorry, I misunderstood. I guess I thought we were talking about Eagle/Orion
radios and I carried the thread forward.
That level of notch performance you describe in the SDR is pretty darned good!.
The other day, when I said “end of thread” for me, that certainly was not an
order to stop the topic. Of course I am not a reflector moderator and have no
authority.
I only had gotten to the point at which I thought there might be some folks who
were getting tired of my sort of monologue on the topic. Several interesting
comments have since been posted by others, including yourself, on the topic.
It is still an interesting discussion, though as others have said, its
importance in day-to-day operation is limited.
Your comment about the IC-7300 and the possibility for adding a preselector is
well taken. I was not aware of that and might even look at it myself since I do
really like the radio otherwise.
Still no word from Ten Ten on new products so what the heck???
Gary
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 9:12 AM, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
>
> I don't recall saying anything about "Eagle".
>
> I was using an $800 SDR QRP transceiver.
> YES, the S-Meter dropped. All traces of the disturbing signal completely
> vanished.
>
> In CW I only need the notch about once in a million years when using a radio
> with good filters, so an auto notch with that performance is certainly more
> than good enough.
>
> 73
> Rick, DJ0IP
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary F
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 4:06 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle?
>
> Rick, are you telling me that the S meter needle dropped when you needled the
> notch filter? None of the Eagles I have had produced at result.
>
> Gary
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Jul 21, 2017, at 1:33 AM, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
>>
>> I was operating 40m SSB recently and had a disturbing dual-tone carrier come
>> up on my frequency. The two tones were about 800 Hz and 600 Hz, +/-, and a
>> good S9.
>>
>> I pushed the notch button on my SDR transceiver and both tones instantly and
>> completely disappeared, enabling perfect copy of the SSB station. I was so
>> surprised, I thought the two-tone signal had coincidentally ceased. I turned
>> the notch off and both tones were back at S9. Notch on again: both tones
>> completely gone.
>>
>> I find this to be a dramatic improvement over the old fashion manual notch
>> filter which could only remove one tone.
>>
>> 73
>> Rick, DJ0IP
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>> Bernie Skoch via TenTec
>> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:07 AM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Cc: Bernie Skoch; Rick Cochran; n4py3@earthlink.net
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle?
>>
>> It's a very nice feature if you are bring QRMd by a nearby carrier. With a
>> good working one you can notch the carrier out and not have to listen to it.
>>
>>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 20:51, Rick Cochran via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, use almost all CW on my OMNI VII. I am not sure what the notch
>>> filter is. Never used it.
>>>
>>> I have a couple of Yaesu rigs and have no idea how to use notch.
>>>
>>> Doesn't sound like a critical feature to me.
>>>
>>> 73s,
>>>
>>> WO8L
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I find the hardware noise blanker on my Orion works very well. It's on a
>>>> par with the Flex 6500 noise blanker system.
>>>>
>>>> Carl Moreschi N4PY
>>>> 58 Hogwood Rd
>>>> Louisburg, NC 27549
>>>> www.n4py.com
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2017 8:18 PM, David W LeJeune, Sr wrote:
>>>>> Thanks, Rick. I'd heard that Rob had a hand in it's improvement. Had a
>>>>> friend who had one of the original Orion's and the noise blanker was
>>>>> almost worthless. On my Orion II, the auto notch still causes distortion
>>>>> of the audio signal when in use. Not sure if this is common. Still use
>>>>> the Orion II on 80meter SSB and a lot on CW on all bands. But the Flex
>>>>> 6500 is a lot better than my old Flex 5000 on CW.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave WN5V
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>>>>> rick@dj0ip.de
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:55 PM
>>>>> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
>>>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle?
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>> That is only because Rob Sherwood worked long and hard on Ten-Tec and
>>>>> FLEX to fix their problems. When they originally shipped, neither were
>>>>> any good at blanking electric fences.
>>>>> We all owe Rob a huge amount of gratitude for the many years of service
>>>>> he has given us.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>> Rick, DJ0IP
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>>>>> David W LeJeune, Sr
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 9:48 PM
>>>>> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
>>>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have an electrical fence next door. Both the noise blanker in my Orion
>>>>> II and the one in my Flex 6500 easily take out that type of noise as well
>>>>> as ignition noise. The Orion has a manual notch filter (sort of). It's
>>>>> really a fixed freq notch at either 300 hz or 1050 hz. You can use that
>>>>> with CW and the RIT - move the interfering hetrodyne inside of the
>>>>> selected notch. Of course, you have to accept the change in the pitch of
>>>>> the CW signal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave WN5V
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>>>>> rick@dj0ip.de
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 9:36 AM
>>>>> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
>>>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary,
>>>>>
>>>>> Your Pro 2 of course is ancient history now. Was a great radio in its
>>>>> day.
>>>>> Manual notch filters are fine on CW because "we" use our brain to notch
>>>>> the disturbance and not the desired frequency. The auto-notch can't tell
>>>>> the difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regardless of what it can and can't do, if it dies, you probably won't
>>>>> even get spare parts for it. And brand new radios are no longer coming
>>>>> with manual notch filters (except for the old stock sitting on shelves
>>>>> and being offered at dumping prices to get rid of it).
>>>>>
>>>>> If my memory serves me right, that was still one of the radios with a
>>>>> useful noise blanker for blanking out electrical fences. None of the new
>>>>> DSP noise blankers can do that as well as the old noise blankers.
>>>>>
>>>>> There certainly were advantages in the older radios but we will probably
>>>>> only see one more new radio come out in Japan with that old
>>>>> technology...at the end of this year.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if Mike will bring out an Eagle or Omni VII again. The
>>>>> eagle has a good noise blanker, the OM7 has a DSP blanker, but it has
>>>>> been improved in firmware for use near electrical fences; still not as
>>>>> good as older technology though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ones step forward, two steps back! (hi)
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>> Rick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>>>>> Dukes HiFi
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:03 PM
>>>>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>>>>> Cc: Bernie Skoch
>>>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle?
>>>>>
>>>>> In side-by-side comparison, an Icon IC-756 Pro2 notch filter versus an
>>>>> Orion/Eagle type notch filter, using my Pro 2 manual notch filter (which
>>>>> also works in CW, and is inside the AGC loop), I can hear weak but
>>>>> desired signals far more easily with the otherwise inferior Pro 2 than I
>>>>> can with the otherwise superior Orion/Eagle. This is especially true when
>>>>> the offending carrier is keyed, since the Pro 2 receiver is not
>>>>> constantly adjusting gain to compensate for the keyed offending carrier.
>>>>>
>>>>> One can SORT of obtain similar results by turning off the AGC in the
>>>>> Orion/Eagle when using the notch filter as long as you don’t need any AGC
>>>>> action.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Bernie Skoch via
>>>>>> TenTec<tentec@contesting.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rick,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not believe I am "out in right field."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Someone commented that all Ten Tec notch filters are useless. I
>>>>>> disagreed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>> Bernie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 02:30, rick@dj0ip.de<Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You guys are all out in right field.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No radio's auto notch filter works in CW mode.
>>>>>>> They cannot distinguish between the useful tone and the disturbing tone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yes, in that case, a manual notch filter is indeed better,
>>>>>>> but show me a radio built today that has one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I find the Eagle's notch filter effective on SSB.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73
>>>>>>> Rick, DJ0IP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>> Bernie Skoch via TenTec
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:21 AM
>>>>>>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>>>>>>> Cc: Bernie Skoch; w2iy@verizon.net
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "It's sort of useless, like all Ten Tec notch filters..."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I _LOVE_ my Orion II notch filter!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The automatic feature is good, but the manual one is about the
>>>>>>> best I've ever used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>> Bernie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 16:33, Gary F<dukeshifi@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Eagle does have a notch function. I don't recall how to
>>>>>>>> activate it
>>>>>>> but it is in the manual.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's sort of useless, like all Ten Tec notch filters, since it
>>>>>>>> is outside
>>>>>>> the AGC loop, so, while it does not have the carrier, it also
>>>>>>> attenuated your desired signal by about as much as it reduces the
>>>>>>> carrier.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The reduction to 20 watts in Tune is self-defense. Orion's do it
>>>>>>>> too. This
>>>>>>> is to prevent the presence of full 100 watts into a mismatch. It
>>>>>>> is good policy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Orion's had an option in which you could press the Power button,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> believe, to get 100 watts in Tune after match had been reached.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Red arid green the A//B VFO, there really is no A or B VFO in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> traditional sense and Eagle only has one tuning knob. Therefore,
>>>>>>> the A/B indicator serves no function in transceive operation. In
>>>>>>> split operation, that indicator should flip when going fro RX to
>>>>>>> TX to tell you which displayed frequency is the TX frequency.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 3:05 PM, Michael Tortorella<w2iy@verizon.net>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all, I am hearing an awful lot of steady carrier signals up
>>>>>>>>> here in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> frozen north of Downeast Maine. Most are not very strong and they go
>>>>>>> away
>>>>>>>>> when I disconnect the antenna so they are external to the radio.
>>>>>>>>> Today I am chasing TR8CA on 20 CW, he is way down in the noise,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> 100 Hz away from one of these carriers. Sure would be nice to
>>>>>>>>> have something like a notch filter to help in situations like
>>>>>>>>> these but I could not see anywhere in the manual or front panel
>>>>>>>>> where I could notch the offending carrier. Is there any list wisdom
>>>>>>>>> on this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On another note, I did contact service at TT last week with my
>>>>>>>>> question about power out in autotune; after only a few days
>>>>>>>>> delay I got an answer that the power out in autotune is 20
>>>>>>>>> watts even though the power output shown on the display is 100.
>>>>>>>>> This seems not quite right from a human factors point of view,
>>>>>>>>> maybe there can be a firmware fix? Also, when exchanging VFOs,
>>>>>>>>> the A,B labels do not change even when the B vfo is in large
>>>>>>>>> type at the top of the display. I find this confusing. OK, I
>>>>>>>>> guess this turned into a longer letter about a couple of other
>>>>>>>>> things besides notch filtering, so please excuse my prolixity
>>>>>>>>> and thank for the BW. Any suggestions
>>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and 73, Mike W2IY
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>>>>>>>> http://www.avg.com
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|