Topband: Re: Bridges and BC interference

To:	<topband@contesting.com>
Subject:	Topband: Re: Bridges and BC interference
From:	zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX)
Date:	Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:50:42 +1300

I don't have one of these devices myself, but if I did, and it needed a BC
filter, I would open it up and place the filter between the RF bridge and
the detector.  That way the measurement accuracy should not be affected by
the filter.  Of course, the warranty is then nullified, but better that than
a bridge that is unreliable due to BC interference.

73, Greg, ZL3IX

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Topband: Reactance problem, (continued) Topband: Reactance problem, Bill Gerhold Topband: Reactance problem, W2pm@aol.com Topband: Reactance problem, Pete Smith Topband: Reactance problem, Larry Molitor Topband: Reactance problem, Herb Schoenbohm Topband: Reactance problem, Bert Barry Topband: Reactance problem, W2pm@aol.com Topband: Reactance problem, Terry Posey Topband: Reactance problem, Bill Gerhold FW: Topband: Reactance problem, Garry Shapiro Topband: Re: Bridges and BC interference, Greg - ZL3IX <= Topband: Reactance problem, Steve Ireland

Previous by Date:	Topband: Tunable External Preselector for better Beverage S/N?, Tom Rauch
Next by Date:	Topband: 180 degree phase toroid, Chris Allingham
Previous by Thread:	FW: Topband: Reactance problem, Garry Shapiro
Next by Thread:	Topband: Reactance problem, Steve Ireland
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]