| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Geomagnetic absorption of horizontally polarized antenna signals? |
| From: | zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX) |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:25:20 +1200 |
> "I wonder if anyone can offer opinions on the advantages that > vertically > polarized antennas have over horizontals on 160M related to > geomagnetic > Earth absortion?" > > Tom, > > There's an excellent discussion of this question in the chapter on > propagation (the first chapter) in the latest edition of ON4UN's book > on low band DXing And even better in Bob NM7M's recently published book "The Big Gun's Guide to Low Band Propagation" 73, GReg, ZL3IX |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Topband Geomagnetic Absorption, <kn4lf@arrl.net (KN4LF, T. F. Giella) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Lightning and Beverages, Tom Rauch |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Geomagnetic absorption of horizontally polarized antenna signals?, <brehm@texas.net (Brad Rehm) |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: Geomagnetic absorption of horizontally polarized antenna signals?, Tom Rauch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |