Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL Bandwidth petition

To: K1PX@msn.com, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL Bandwidth petition
From: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:04:26 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Jim, K1PX wrote:

"The ARRL is soliciting comments on consideration of regulating subbands
by bandwidth rather than by mode. 

"It appears that this is to include the HF bands, as indicated below, but
there is no mention of 160 meters."
==========
There are presently no subbands on 160m, so that's why it's not
mentioned.

My planned comments (as usual) to the ARRL are to suggest that 160m be
segmented into subbands.  That'll fall to deaf ears (as usual), so when
the FCC asks for comments on the proposal, I'll suggest it to them.

73, de Earl, K6SE
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>