Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Broadband vertical

To: w8ji@contesting.com, barrie@centric.net, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Broadband vertical
From: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:49:54 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Tom, W8JI, in response to my statement that the BW of a shunt-fed tower
was about the same as a series-fed tower, said:

"Actually not unless the shunt system is a VERY thick or wide conductor."
----------
As much as I respect Tom's opinions, I have to disagree here.

I know Tom doesn't necessarily believe in all modeling results, but my
shunt-fed tower modeling has been proven to be highly accurate in that it
agrees with real-world results as far as shunt wire parameters and BW is
concerned.  And most of the shunt feed modeling I have done uses #8 AWG
for the shunt wire.
==========

"To improve bandwidth, you can take steps that increase the amount of
capacitance used in the shunt feed capacitor. That would be a larger
diameter drop wire or a cage of drop wires. Rather than messing around
switching components, I'd use a multiple conductor drop system with wires
spaced as far apart as possible."
----------
Tom's first sentence here agrees with my statement that the broadest BW
occurs when the structure is electrically 1/4-wave.  In such a case, the
shunt-feed capacitor maxes out at approximately 750 pF.  On the other
hand, if the shunt-fed tower is electrically 1/2 wave, the capacitor is
less than 100 pF (and very narrow BW).

As for the rest of Tom's statement, a multiple-wire shunt system actually
increases the BW only slightly (about 5%, as stated in another of my
e-mails on this subject) and, IMO, not sufficiently enough to be worth
the effort.

73, de Earl, K6SE
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>