Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Low Dipole for RX

To: "'GALE STEWARD'" <k3nd@yahoo.com>, "'topband reflector'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Low Dipole for RX
From: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:53:57 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
In his book "Low Band DXing" John, ON4UN, talks about how sometimes signals
can arrive at higher angles.  The more options the better.


Mark Lunday
WD4ELG
Hillsborough, NC - FM06kb
wd4elg@arrl.net
http://wd4elg.net
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com



-----Original Message-----
From: topband-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of GALE STEWARD
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 11:07 AM
To: topband reflector
Subject: Topband: Low Dipole for RX

Anyone using a low dipole on 160 for RX? By low, I mean 8-10ft. I could
install one of these until some of the foliage dies off and I can install my
two-wire beverage. 

Would this be useful or a waste of time? Also, if anyone is using one of
these, did you attach the feedline directly or use some type of matching?
Since the Z is pretty low (a few ohms), I thought a 9:1 xfmr might be
appropriate.

Any info appreciated!

73, Stew K3ND


      
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>