Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Real RST

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Real RST
From: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:13:22 EST
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 11/4/2009 4:30:43 PM Greenwich Standard Time,  
mstangelo@comcast.net writes:

Apparently, there is an unwritten rule to send 59 or 599 instead of  
realistic reports. Besides being meaningless this is noise because it doesn't  
convey any information.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
I am an industrial strength contester.  Automatic 59905  has not always 
been this way, and I still get an occasional 57905 and dutifully  log it as 
such.  However, I don't think they log checkers even look at  the RST anymore.  
Agreed, the RST is pretty meaningless, but you have to  know that if you 
are running a 200+ hour you have a good signal, and if it took  15 minutes to 
break a pileup on a 9Q5 your signal is not really 599.  The  automatic 599 
increases the rates especially in CQWW where the zone is almost  automatic 
(unless you are running W/K)...and rate is what most contesters  love.
 
It's pretty much the same for DXpeditions too, every one is  599.  Although 
not big DX I try to pass out real RSTs when running daily  pileups.  I 
guess this is not always common practice since sometimes guys  will ask for 
"real RST" when I give a 599.
 
Bill KH7XS/K4XS
_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>