To: | "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Fw: Re: Coax Choke Balun |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:32:01 -0800 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Paul Christensen wrote: >> Would a length of RG-8X sufficient for looping through the ferrite >> cores easily handle full legal power on 1.8Mhz? > I have routinely used baluns made with RG-58 at full legal power on 160, 80, and 40 for many years, with no overheating problems, although I don't run RTTY. RG-8X would have even more safety margin. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: 160M inverted L -- my experience to date, Paul B. Peters |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: A plea for antenna help from a fledgling 160m Op!, Guy Olinger K2AV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Fw: Re: Coax Choke Balun, Paul Christensen |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Fw: Re: Coax Choke Balun, mstangelo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |