Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Coax Loops

To: GU4YOX <gu4yox@cwgsy.net>, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Coax Loops
From: Markus Hansen <mkve7ca@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:16:42 -0800
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I agree with Bob.  In noisy locations a coax loop or flag antenna can make a
big difference.  If you live in the country away from other humans and all
their electronic RFI generators then it is unlikley a coax loop will make
much difference compared to a transmitting antenna.

I have described my experiments with the coax loop and a rotatable diamond
shaped low noise directional receiving antenna on my web site for those who
are interested:

http://shelbrook.com/~ve7ca/Ant160.htm

Markus  VE7CA

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, GU4YOX <gu4yox@cwgsy.net> wrote:

> Pete (HB9DSU) was asking about coax loops. I did some work on coax loops a
> few years ago and have had great results. On occasions the signal levels
> are
> higher than on my Beverages but sometimes the converse is true. I think the
> 160M adage is to have as many tools at hand as is necessary to pull
> stations
> out of the noise. The link to my small article is:
> http://www.gu4yox.com/160%20and%2080M%20Rx%20Antennas.htm There is nothing
> new in the design, it just works for me (sometimes!)
>
>
>
> GL 73 Bob
>
> GU4YOX
>
> _______________________________________________
> 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M
>



-- 
Markus Hansen
VE7CA,   North Vancouver, BC  CANADA
Web site:  http://www.shelbrook.com/~ve7ca/
_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>