To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Further to my previous: WAS 160 in three days? |
From: | Thorvaldur Stefansson <otradalur@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:32:44 +0000 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
hello all, a search of the archives revealed the call sign of a ND station who is indeed in my log ! I worked W0ZTL in ND on the 21st of November. He may not be a LOTW user, I will QSL direct to him. Once I have his QSL and Utah as well, WAS 160 is in the bag. :-) So I therefore claim WAS 160 in more or less one Month. I am surprised at the low level of LOTW usage among US stations, though, wish more users would sign up so the system has a chance to work. 73 Thor, TF4M -- "the language of 160M is CW" Lew, W7EW/W7AT _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: WAS 160 in three days?, Thorvaldur Stefansson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Edger for burying ground radials ?, Craig Clark |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: WAS 160 in three days?, Thorvaldur Stefansson |
Next by Thread: | Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days, Thorvaldur Stefansson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |