Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Best small space antennas

To: Jim Miller Waco Texas WB5OXQ <wb5oxq_1@grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Best small space antennas
From: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 20:57:20 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Note: the following is not a theoretical or untested antenna.  There
are working antennas in the field using the folded counterpoise
described below, scoring well in contests**, in use up to a year and
more.  Contest scores of the sort attained are not made using antennas
with significant deficiencies or fundamental flaws.

A miscellaneous end-fed inverted L or end-fed inverted U over an
elevated 5/16 wave single wire folded counterpoise (FCP) will have
good radiation from a small lot, with the ability to put out a strong
signal not usually associated with small lots.  In the simple
implementation of this antenna (160 only), the length of the L or U is
adjusted for zero reactance, usually resulting in a 50-60 ohm feed Z
at resonance.

There are NO radials.  The main design point of the antenna is to
minimize lossy currents induced in the dirt and confine TX signal
current to the FCP and the radiating wire.  This is a real, and lossy
issue for a few short or miscellaneous radials.  Enough of an issue to
kill 15 dB.

The radiating wire first goes up as much vertical as you can manage,
then out as far as manageable, and then down if length is still needed
to prune to resonance.  The main point is to pick a feed point on the
property that has your best vertical rise and then get the rest of the
length for resonance however you can. For some properties this has
meant putting extra angles in the up+over+down radiator.  Some
properties will not need the "down" part.

The antenna uses a REQUIRED isolation transformer at the feed point
because the counterpoise is NOT resonant, and the feed would really
rather use the much lower Z but hugely lossy coax shield current as a
counterpoise.  The folds in the FCP are designed to maximally reduce
counterpoise fields at the ground, reducing lossy currents in the
dirt.

The isolation transformer's leftover inductive reactance, a
disadvantage in many applications, in this case helps to tune out the
capacitive reactance of the FCP and reduces the length of the
radiating wire needed to achieve simple resonance for the antenna.

The counterpoise extends plus and minus 33 feet from the feed point,
167 feet folded into 66 linear feet occupied on the property. The
middle 20 feet of the 66 should be straight, but either end can be
bent away from the straight line to accommodate the property.  Up 8
feet or higher is recommended.  Lowering the counterpoise increases
the coupling to dirt, increasing losses.

The isolation transformer uses the same physical components as a
balun, but the unlike the balun there is NO connection of any kind
between the primary and secondary windings.  This is accomplished with
twenty bifilar turns of double polyimide insulated #14 with teflon
sleeving wound on an Amidon T300A-2  #2 material powdered iron toroid.
One wire is the primary, and the other is the secondary.  The low MU
powdered iron toroid was picked over time to avoid heating, still
provide required coupling, with other choices sometimes failing in
spectacular fashion.  We have no information of our currently-used
winding method on the Amidon T300A-2 ever failing for any cause,
though we would not expect it to survive a direct lightning strike.

With the isolation transformer, the antenna and FCP is entirely above
ground and not connected to anything else. We use a 5 megohm resistor,
in parallel with a non-resistor lawn mower spark plug, from the FCP to
ground as a static drain. The gap drains lightning induced voltage to
protect the resistor, the resistor drains wind, snow, rain static.
The resistor and gap protect the winding from a voltage puncture that
will grow into a carbon track to ground.

73, Guy.

**  As reported in Dec 2011 CQ, Jan 2011 CW160CW contest, USA low
power unassisted, the 29 scores over 100K out of 335 scored logs in
class:

Station, state, score, QSO, ST+PROV, DX

K9AY   WI  259,346 991 58 36
W0UO   TX  250,716 882 58 44
K1EP   MA  232,750 909 56 39
K2AV   NC  223,908 907 57 37 << No radials, 5/16 FCP
K8BL   OH  203,328 819 58 38

KU1CW  KS  197,885 795 58 37
N2WN   TN  191,090 640 55 42
WB8JUI OH  190,372 852 58 38
N7IR   AZ  183,855 856 58 27
W2TZ   NY  178,633 723 56 35


NA8V   MI  177,030 793 59 31
W4AA   FL  173,619 494 56 45
K1HTV  VA  172,956 733 55 32
W1WBB  RI  161,550 654 55 35
KU8E   GA  152,613 615 58 35

W7RH   AZ  135,369 500 55 34
K4WI   AL  128,520 509 55 30
N9NCK  WI  126,162 516 55 31
KV8Q   OH  125,741 674 57 20
N9AUG  OH  125,330 608 55 28


W2TX   FL  121,800 504 52 35
K9QVB  IL  120,120 641 56 21
WW3S   PA  119,848 706 55 16
K2UF   NY  119,392 541 53 29
K0PK   MN  118,400 678 58 16

WF4U   UT  114,239 664 56 15
W1BYH  MA  106,444 404 54 35
W5WMU  LA  106,020 574 54 22
N4JF   AL  101,920 493 54 26

** 3830 claimed scores listing of Dec 2011 ARRL 160 contest, North
America low power unassisted, top 20 of 119 listed as of this writing:

Station, state, score, QSO, ST/PROV, DX
2011 ARRL 160 - 3830 Claimed Scores 06Dec2011

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Call               QSOs   Sec Cntry   hr      Score Club
NA Single Op LP
K8FH               920    74    18    27    175,076 Medina 2 Meter Group
NE9U               978    75    14          172,927 MWA
K4FT               976    75     9    28    166,236 KCG
WB8JUI             940    71     9 21.32    152,560
K0TI               920    76     5    21    150,255 MWA
K0DI               875    75     8    28    146,495 Lincoln ARC
K2AV               788    65     9  21.5    119,066 PVRC    << No
radials, 5/16 FCP
W0DLE              725    74     3    21    112,343 Grand Mesa
K9MMS              653    74    10    16    112,224 SMC
K0PK               657    72     6    19    104,130 MWA

K3PA               618    74     7          101,817 Kansas City DX Club
WA1FCN             645    68     7           99,864 ACG
K2ZR               695    64     4  20.0     90,112 Western NY DX Associ
K0AD               584    75     6    10     88,500 MWA
W0UO               519    71     9    14     85,680 NTCC
K0CN               478    73    11           83,076 MWA
N1IX               516    60    10    13     78,540 YCCC
VE3OSZ             442    68    15           77,854 CCO
W9ZRX              492    69     8  20.5     77,616 SMC
W7RH               437    72     8           76,869 Arizona Outlaws Cont



On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Jim Miller Waco Texas WB5OXQ
<wb5oxq_1@grandecom.net> wrote:
> With limited space what is the best antenna for 160?  The only room available 
> is a 130X50' area.  Ground radials will be nearly impossable to put in large 
> enough to be of much value.  1/4 wave antenna tried, very narrowband and 
> interfeared with every receiving device in a block.  I may just be out of 
> luck.  wb5oxq
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>