Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance

To: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance
From: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:00:04 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Don. No doubt mag loop is far less sensitive to interaction than the flag or 
pennants where metal objects within 50 ft will certainly distort the pattern. 
Mostly the foward lobe but modelling and observation shows the fwd lobe is 
broad anyway. 

I have heard a notable 160 dx ER say the height of a mag loop can frantically 
affect its ability to reduce local noise however.  He claimed having the bottom 
of the ring 10 ft up is optimal but also suspected that's purely a condition of 
the local noise character. I can tell you strong power line crud and be very 
spotty too eminating more strongly from certain spots on the span than others. 
Since I use a MFJ nuller as well found sense antenna location critical to 
success.  Have also used a magnetic loop as the noise sense antenna quite well 
broadside the loop to the noise. Provides a far more table noise source and 
thus makes nuller more effective and easier to tune. 

Btw I use a SW (VK) facing half flag hidden in a tree Which happens to have its 
rear null direct to nasty power line noise 500 ft away and it's great. I only 
use 6db or ago of preamp on it tho. Beyond that it could pickup too much local 
noise in my setting. 

73

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Don Kirk <wd8dsb@aol.com> wrote:

> W2PM said,
> 
> "A comparison of the Wellbrook product which is a magnetic loop is not a good 
> one  to a AY loop or other low angle directive receive antenna. Mag loops are 
> not "directive" in the same way they only have a very sharp null to two 
> opposite directions and omni directional vertically. Nice for nulling strong 
> local point source noise but that's it. It will enable qsos not possible 
> otherwise and some DX I suppose but Wellbrook is not a good choice for any 
> serious DX work. No mag antenna is."
> ---------------------- 
> 
> And so far my testing fully supports the above comments by W2PM, and 
> calculated RDF values along with takeoff angle really appears to help predict 
> the S/N performance of one antenna system versus another when dealing with 
> normal atmospheric noise that's coming in from all directions or at least say 
> multiple directions (with a higher RDF value and lower takeoff angle 
> generally being desired for DX which is not a strong point of Mag loops 
> compared with AY loops, Flags/Pennants, etc.).
> 
> For local point source generated noise such as a Plasma TV, the Mag loop 
> really helps if the offending signal is 90 degrees (or 270 deg) to the 
> desired signal.  Whereas the Pennant/Flag really helps when the offending 
> signal is 180 degrees to the desired signal.
> 
> I have a gut feeling through preliminary testing I've done that a shielded 
> mag loop has less interaction (less distortion of its pattern) due to nearby 
> objects when compared with a small rotatable flag, possibly making a well 
> balanced mag loop usable where the Pennant/Flag might not be (very small lot 
> size, indoor operation, etc.).  Detailed pattern measurements need to be done 
> in order to quantify this casual observation.
> 
> I should also mention that I only obtain an approximate 2 db improvement (on 
> average) in S/N performance using my half size pennants compared with my 68 
> foot tall base loaded TX vertical (but in reality I believe this is close to 
> what I should expect based on calculated RDF values).  I also notice that the 
> S/N difference is much greater between my pennants and TX vertical for 
> stations close in versus DX which is likely due to differences in elevation 
> patterns between my pennants and my TX vertical.  Contrary to most folks 
> opinion, I set my preamp gain on my pennants to provide a noise floor 
> identical to that of my TX vertical for S/N comparison measurements (I find 
> it impossible to quantify S/N performance between two antenna systems any 
> other way under real life operating conditions, and I continuously switch 
> rapidly between the two different antenna systems in order to evaluate the 
> average S/N improvement).
> 
> I am by no means an expert on this topic, but I wanted to share my 
> comments/experiences since I've been doing a lot of testing of shielded mag 
> loops and small pennants and flags during the past 3 years. 
> 
> 73's
> Don (wd8dsb)
> 
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>