I'm feeling good. And lot of optimism for next night :)
Result in contest is not very interesting, I need only some states to
finish my WAS - 160m. From 5/7/0 area's.
W0SD (S.D.) was great s7-8 during few hour's, called many times,
but.....K0HA (NE) not so strong but some s5-7. Heard him few times.
N8OO (LA) in morning hours s9 - worked only state-side,....many many
call's.
VY2ZM and K3ZM those two biggest signals, over s9.
Biggest signal's were 22-0145z. Later snow and QRM. About 04-05z all
station's dissapear. Only few BIG ONE's.
73, Sam LY5W
Vertical , BV, KW
On 12/1/12, Jim F. <> wrote:
> Hi Saulius,
>
> I know (almost) exactly how you feel :-)
>
> 73,
>
> jim / W1FMR / QRP.
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 12/1/12, Saulius Zalnerauskas <> wrote:
>
> Spent whole night 2200z-0600z with 49 QSO's in the LOG.
> Find one moment free frequence to call CQ. 1 call back to me from VE.
> That's all. Full band 1800 KHz - 1880 kHz full of W/VE station's
> making QSO's each-other, they are very LOUD, but don't hear EU :(
> Maybe next night would be much more better!?
>
> Sam LY5W will be ready at 2130z
> 49 QSO, 23 section's, long list of station's called but not worked,
> called dozen of W5/W0 too with no luck
>
> On 12/1/12, Eddy Swynar <> wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-12-01, at 8:39 AM, Eddy Swynar wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I personally think that the notion of keeping 1825 - 1830-KHz "clean" of
>>> NA stations calling CQ is a good one...
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Obviously this "typo" was a test meant to see if anyone was awake yet...!
>> Hi
>> Hi
>>
>> Of course I MEANT to say 1830- to 1835-KHz---but fat fingers (and a
>> skinny
>> mind) got in the way.
>>
>> Thanks go to Bert for keeping things on an even keel here...
>>
>> ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
> _______________________________________________
> Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
>
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
|