Here's some things to think about when we think we know polarization or
polarization tilt, or non-reciprocal propagation or paths:
1.) When receiving, antenna response to the desired signal compared to
antenna response to noise determines copy, NOT the gain or absolute signal
level. An antenna with the best signal level is not often the antenna with
the best signal level, so we cannot use readability as a determinant.
2.) Most simple vertically polarized antennas have good low angle response,
and are vertically polarized in all directions. The exception is a small
loop antenna, which is only perfectly vertical along the horizon off the
radial direction of the loop. At all other angles it is a mix of
polarization.
3.) Most horizontal antennas are mixed polarization, and are only perfectly
horizontal off the broadside. The exception is properly built and installed
small horizontally-polarized loop.
4.) When we mix antennas or compare antennas to determine polarization, each
reference antenna has to be normalized to the same response level at the
angle and direction of the arriving signal. If response (sensitivity) is
different and we have no idea how different, then we have no idea of
polarization tilt or rotation.
5.) When we compare signals to make a claim or study if a path is
non-reciprocal, we have to precisely know the difference in signal field
strength levels on two paths. We can't tell anything for certain if we are
listening only to S/N (readability) or the antennas are optimal for
polarization and wave angle.
I don't think there is much chance of resolving this into useful
information, because Hams really don't even want to bother with simple field
strength measurements of antenna changes. We live mostly by feelings, and
don't generally want to be bothered with facts or science. :-)
Unless we know what to measure and how to measure it, and actually measure
or compare something, we are just guessing.
73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
|