Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Antenna matching question

To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>, "Bill Wichers" <billw@waveform.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Antenna matching question
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:12:37 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Wrong reflector, but I disagree completely with this:

The HV build up was mitigated by the 10pf cap between the 40-20M positions which also reduces arcing on the SB-220 which is a shorting switch and a cap can be adapted to some 160-10M amps. The right hand one in that photo had the 80-40M contacts replaced and Id bet there was still a carbon track that wasnt removed, you can easily see the deposits all around that wafer; a good sign of a poor repair tech. Originally a sure sign of high VSWR or open relay.

Same style wafers as in the SB-220, Clipperton L , AL-80 family and others that lived on the edge that still arc today. The arcing is usually a high VSWR, open circuit due to relay, way out of tolerance carbon parasitic suppressor resistors, mistuning as was likely the cause on the left wafer on 10M, and CB use since the NCL-2000 was one of their favorites in the 70-80's. Another cause is not knowing how to read the manual tuning instructions and tuning full bore key down in the SSB position. As built it was a 1000W INPUT CW amp and 2000W INPUT PEP on SSB. That is about 600/1200W output respectively as was common on many amps of the pre 1500W output era. Funny how they all seemed to be OK before the rules changed and switch configurations werent an easy way out to cast blame.....


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>