I guess it was a SDR-1000 or Flex5000
73
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of MIKE
DURKIN
Sent: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 08:08
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
Come on Bill ... did i say you did ?
>also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't see
that structure ...
Id like to know what SDR was so poor.
SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old woman)
Flying Circus any one?
> From: baycock@mediacombb.net
> To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500
>
> Mike--
> It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is.
> and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive.
> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> Bill--W4BSG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MIKE DURKIN
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
>
> If i must ....
>
> Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate
signals
> ...
>
> That in its self has three problems ...
>
> NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not
> apples to turds)
> poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)?
> insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull SDR
> that he built.
>
> Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by simply
> omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering radio
> operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put into
the
> SDR i guess.
>
> And i worry about you Bill .... the word "SPAM" being an expletive in your
> vocabulary ...
>
> I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this --
>
> When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it will
> have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed.
>
> how many samples per second are true overload .... and i mean overload --
> not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really shouldn't
put
> forth an opinion as truth.
>
> That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out
the
> difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it out,
> if not again.
>
> Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell.
>
>
>
>
> > From: baycock@mediacombb.net
> > To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500
> > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MIKE DURKIN
> > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM
> > To: topband@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >
> > SPAM !!!!!!
> >
> > Mike--
> > Can you explain this opinion?
> > In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is
well
> > thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me.
> > Bill--W4BSG
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|