I vote you take your contentious attitude somewhere else MIKE DURKIN
Cecil
K5DL
Sent using recycled electrons.
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:07 AM, MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com> wrote:
>
> Come on Bill ... did i say you did ?
>> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
>
> Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't see
> that structure ...
> Id like to know what SDR was so poor.
>
> SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old woman)
> Flying Circus any one?
>
>
>> From: baycock@mediacombb.net
>> To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500
>>
>> Mike--
>> It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is.
>> and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive.
>> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
>> Bill--W4BSG
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MIKE DURKIN
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM
>> To: topband@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
>>
>> If i must ....
>>
>> Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate signals
>> ...
>>
>> That in its self has three problems ...
>>
>> NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not
>> apples to turds)
>> poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)?
>> insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull SDR
>> that he built.
>>
>> Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by simply
>> omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering radio
>> operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put into the
>> SDR i guess.
>>
>> And i worry about you Bill .... the word "SPAM" being an expletive in your
>> vocabulary ...
>>
>> I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this --
>>
>> When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it will
>> have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed.
>>
>> how many samples per second are true overload .... and i mean overload --
>> not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really shouldn't put
>> forth an opinion as truth.
>>
>> That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out the
>> difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it out,
>> if not again.
>>
>> Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: baycock@mediacombb.net
>>> To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
>>> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: MIKE DURKIN
>>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM
>>> To: topband@contesting.com
>>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
>>>
>>> SPAM !!!!!!
>>>
>>> Mike--
>>> Can you explain this opinion?
>>> In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is well
>>> thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me.
>>> Bill--W4BSG
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>>> _________________
>>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>>
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|