Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Strange propagation

To: wi5a@sbcglobal.net, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation
From: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:57:47 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Larry, You are entitled to your opinion.  I can see your point.  But don't 
blame the RHR guys.  I would blame those who you think should not be getting 
credit and do.  I'll bet some hams use RHR and they don't care about awards, 
they just want to operate ham radio because MAYBE they can't otherwise.



-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Burke <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 6:37 pm
Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation

> The ethics of the whole thing has already been settled by the ARRL so
ethics don't have to be looked at.

Actually the ARRL didn't do squat about ethics. They left the "ethics" up to
the operator. You are confusing "rules" with "ethics". There is a difference
between what is permitted and what is moral/ethical. Adultery is not a crime
in most industrialized countries. It is not a crime in 29 of the US states.
It is "legal" -- but ask your spouse whether they think it is cheating.

Larry K5RK





_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>