Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

To: "GEORGE WALLNER" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>, "Bruce Osterberg" <n9bx73@gmail.com>,<topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size
From: Don Greenbaum <don@aurumtel.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:32:04 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Bruce, and George is always loud where ever he goes!!!!

Don
N1DG

At 07:19 PM 1/2/2018, GEORGE WALLNER wrote:
Bruce, I often use an 18 m Spiderpole with two loading wires, sloping out from the tip at about 60 degrees. I use 18 gauge insulated wires and run 1500 W. I have not seen any signs of overheating. Current is less through the top part of the antenna so wire diameter is less critical (but the voltages can be very high at the wire ends!). I would, however, use thicker wire on the vertical part of the antenna (AWG 12 or larger). Alternatively, use three or four parallel wires on the vertical section (tied together both at the bottom and top). Space them out around the pole. You can see a 43 foot version (being tested for the upcoming KH1 expedition) at C6AGU, on QRZ.com. I have ran 1000 W on that antenna without issues. 73, George On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:31:48 -0600 Bruce Osterberg <n9bx73@gmail.com> wrote: > Good Morning:\ > > To improve my 160 vertical ... 26 Gage >wire for the capacity Hat. > > Bruce N9BX 73 > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - >http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

N1DG--Licensed since 1962
www.goldtel.net
EX-WB2DND, A61AD (GUEST OP, QSL MGR), A52DG, C92DG, /KH4, /KH9, /BV, /VP8O, /VS6, /4X, /9V Webmaster: VP8O, K4M, BS7H, K5K, A52A, VK0IR, 9M0C, ZK1XXP, WB2DND/KH9, BQ9P, ZL9CI
QSL Manager:  A61AD, A61AO, A61X, A61AQ, KH7Z
Member:  NCDXF, CWops, ARRL, DDXA, YCCC
2006 Inductee into the CQ DX Hall of Fame
Treasurer, NCDXF
DON GREENBAUM , DUXBURY, MA, USA

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>