I've been saying this for years! It's pretty clear in the regs:
§ 97.119 Station identification.
 (a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must 
transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting channel at the end of each 
communication, and at least every 10 minutes during a communication, for the 
purpose of clearly making the source of the transmissions from the station known 
to those receiving the transmissions. No station may transmit unidentified 
communications or signals, or transmit as the station call sign, any call sign 
not authorized to the station.
Unfortunately, the FCC is a shadow of it's former self with virtually no
enforcement anymore. They're a bunch of lawyers whose main concern appears
the auctioning of spectrum to make big bucks for the Government...and I thought
the airwaves belonged to the people!.
73, Roger N1RJ
On 10/12/2019 4:39 PM, Dave Clouser wrote:
 
My opinion, may not be popular.
 Note:  I'm not talking about hams remoting to _their own_ station.  That is what 
the great technology is meant for.
 A remote station to someone else s equipment is not identifying legally in my 
opinion.  Think about it.  What if there is RFI or other malicious interference 
other coming from that station? There is no way to identify it.  The station 
identifies as whoever is using the remote.
 Remotes should be required, per FCC, to identify as the station that is 
transmitting.  That means the licensed operator in that particular location who 
owns the station.
Example: NZ3M/W1XXX or whatever.
 There are hundreds of stations that hams can log into all over the world and 
operate using their own call sign.  Some large stations are $ per minute and 
many are free.
This is my 2 cents, take it as you wish.
73
Dave NZ3M
On 10/12/2019 3:54 PM, Raymond Benny wrote:
 
Greg, you, VU2GSM and others openly state how you are operating, and follow
the accepted rules. And I'm glad you do.
Those who do not and claim DXCC credit for a out of country remote credit
should openly be called out. This may not stop many of them but atleast
they will known we know their mode of operation.
I do hope that those calling out stations have darn good evidence and not
doing it as a personal vendetta.
Ray,
N6VR
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019, 11:59 AM Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz> wrote:
 
Guys need to be more discriminatory when discussing remote operation. I
use a remote installation, and have for years, but I abide by the DXCC
rules which state that the Tx and Rx antennas have to be within 500 m of
each other. Furthermore, this installation I designed and built myself,
and I maintain myself, with great effort. This practice should NOT be
equated with the practice of using a random Rx installation on the Net,
probably not even in the same country as the operator using it.
73, Greg, ZL3IX
On 2019-10-13 07:34, WW3S wrote:
 
Good for you Roger....you always hear about hams using remotes to work
 
 
the dx, but they don’t usually say much when the dx uses a remote to hear
them....
 
Sent from my iPad
 
On Oct 12, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
 
 
 
wrote:
 
There is no way an organization such as the ARRL can prevent cheating
 
 
 
in the DXCC program. It has to depend on the honesty of the hams involved.
Yes..some
 
people will cheat but I can't see how they can derive any satisfaction
 
 
 
from
 
that.
Last year I worked VU2GSM on Top Band. I heard rumors that Kanti used
 
 
 
remote
 
receiving locations and, when asked, he freely admitted it. He's in my
 
 
 
log
 
but I didn't claim credit for that contact.
YMMV!
73, Roger N1RJ
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
 
 
 
Reflector
 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
 
 
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
 
 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
 
 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
 
 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
 
 |