In a message dated 98-05-17 19:19:46 EDT, wa6ibu@earthlink.net writes:
> > The PEAK gain figures from our tribander comparison test show that
> the
> > TH-7 (same antenna/boomlength as TH-6) has 3.3 dBd on 20, 5.7 dBd on 15
> and
> > 3.4 dBd on 10M. The C-3 has 4.1 dBd on 20M, 5.7 on 15 and 3.0 on 10M. It
> > doesn't look like you're giving any performance away.
> >
> Steve,
>
> I'm surprised that there is not a larger difference between the two
> antennas. The TH6/7 is essentially a 3 element yagi verses the C4 which
> has only 2 elements per band. How can the difference be so little. Is
> there some other performance factor that was optimized over another that
> sacrificed forward gain on the TH?
Good questions. Remember the TH6 was designed in the 60's in the 'cut-
and-try' age of antenna designing. It took 4 hours per iteration due to making
the change, running the antenna up, running patterns, plotting a Smith chart
and making calculations with a slide rule. The primary design criteria was
maximum front-to-back since that's what the Hy-Gain range does best, not gain.
And it's got traps.
The C-3 was designed with state-of-the-art computer modelling software
and literally hundreds of iterations before construction began so it's very
optimized. And it doesn't have any traps.
Don't forget that gain is a function of boomlength, not the number of
elements. The TH7 boom is 24 feet and the C-3 is 18 feet.
Cheers, Steve K7LXC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|