To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns |
From: | K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com) |
Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:31:14 EST |
In a message dated 1/15/01 10:02:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, aa4lr@arrl.net writes: > Do you want to do it "right" or "good enough"? Your source is correct > that Rohn tower sections are actually stronger than their published > figures. The design rules are likely to be 200-300% over the rated loads. I don't think that's right. The figures I've seen are 30-50%. The problem is that wind pressures do not go up linearly - the pressures go up geometrically. You run out of engineering overhead real quick if your tower takes a gust higher than your design windspeed. For instance, a wind 71 MPH exerts windpressure of 20 PSF; a gust at 87 MPH has a force of 30 PSF - a 50% increase for a 16 MPH increase in windspeed. The LXC Prime Directive still applies - DO what the manufacturer says. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, Bill Coleman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, K7LXC@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, Bill Coleman |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Tower concerns, K7LXC@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |