Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] problems with 10m COMTEK 4 sq unit

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] problems with 10m COMTEK 4 sq unit
From: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:00:25 +0100
Unless over an extensive ground system and avoiding to elevate the antenna
from ground, a vertical array on 10m will not have a consistent energy
radiated at very low angles and no signal enforcement at any elevation
because of ground reflections.
In the other hand, there are moments where a wide coverage of elevation
angles and the capability to vary beam in a short time can be useful in
spite of the cited gaps.

73,
Mauri I4JMY


----- Original Message -----
From: <K7LXC@aol.com>
To: <tduffy@sygnet.com>; <K3BU@aol.com>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] problems with 10m COMTEK 4 sq unit


> In a message dated 3/19/01 8:55:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> tduffy@sygnet.com writes:
>
> > I have a 4 square on 10 meters with the Comtek hybrid and it works
perfect.
> >
>     Okay, I'll bite. What was your rationale for building one for 10M?
While
> 160, 80 and 40 versions are plentiful, I haven't heard of one for 10M.
What
> advantages would it have on 10M where yagis are fairly cheap and
effective?
>
> Cheers,    Steve    K7LXC
> Tower Tech
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>