I agree....let me see here: Towertalk.......tower restrictions due to
CC&R's....sure seems logical to me. I'd imagine this is a topic that MOST
readers here could possibly have to confront if things don't improve! I'm
sure with the group in my neighborhood, that it's simply a matter of time.
They've complained about air conditioning units that could be seen from the
street (this is Florida), not parking cars across the sidewalks that cross
our driveways, week-ender boats parked in driveways, house colors....it's
inevitable once they spot my 60' tower!
KC9CS
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddy Avila" <k6sdw@hotmail.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] deed restrictions
> Stu and Chuck,
>
> I find it interesting you guys believe this is off the Tower reflector
> subject when in fact these covenants aim to eliminate just that, towers
and
> antennas attached to towers....so, tell me what is appropriate for this
> reflector if we all lose the right to put up tall towers on land we own?
>
> Regarding law opinions, unless the writer identifies himself as an
attorney
> I doubt anyone would take this as legal advice! If anything, I would hope
> they would be contacting the ARRL legal department for help...
>
> Anyway, I still maintain that this subject needs the full attention of all
> US hams otherwise we won't need a Tower reflector anymore...
>
> 73 all......./ed
>
|