Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose
From: gclute@attbi.com (Geo Clute W7LFD)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:18:04 -0700
Wasn't there an unwritten agreement between financial institutions that 
centered on withholding financing for certain races in certain residential 
neighborhoods?  Wasn't that called redlining?  What exactly was redlining, and 
wasn't it struck down and made against the law?

Geo W7LFD 

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-admin@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Paul Christensen
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:11 AM
To: WYsixK; Dave Pomeroy; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose


> So slavery is OK as long as you can get them to sign a contract?
> Wrong.
>
> In addition, many CC&Rs still contain a "no non-caucasian can live
> here" clause.  But it has been ruled unenforceable.

This is yet another example of drawing the distinctions between 
Unconstitutional and unlawful.  The private actions that make these
things wrong falls under statutory law, not the Constitution.  The Civil Rights 
Act of 1964 is an example of legislation that was
necessary.  Quite honestly, the U.S. Constitution does not address abuses by 
private citizens, nor does it care.  It leaves it up to
Congress and the states to figure it out.

-Paul, W9AC


_______________________________________________
Towertalk mailing list
Towertalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>