On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 n4kg@juno.com wrote:
> Note that both of these 'solutions' are probably violations of
> 'the Prime Directive', but the towers are still standing.
Yes, but for how much longer? Just because it can be done doesn't mean
it's safe or permanent by any means. If the tower fell, causing measurable
property insurance, would the insurance company be obliged to pay, or
would they have reason to balk at a claim?
--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR <kris@nospam.catonic.net> TGIFreeBSD IM: 'KrisBSD'
"BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!"
This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security
|