Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Re: Coax Disconnection AND A BIGGER ISSUE

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: Coax Disconnection AND A BIGGER ISSUE
From: dick.green@VALLEY.NET (Dick Green)
Date: Sat Aug 9 13:34:03 2003
Yes, I have the same problem. What can we do??

73, Dick WC1M

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Havlicek [mailto:n8de@thepoint.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 8:33 AM
> To: Michael Tope
> Cc: James White; towertalk
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Coax Disconnection AND A BIGGER ISSUE
> 
> 
> My REPEATED attempts to submit a REPLY COMMENT re:  PPL 
> TELCOM, LLC meet with the following error message from the FCC site:
> 
> DOCUMENT SAVE FAILED. PLEASE RE-SUBMIT THE COMMENT.
> 
> Anyone else getting the same error message ?
> 
> Don
> N8DE
> 
> 
> Michael Tope wrote:
> > Jim, et al:
> > 
> > Make sure you are wearing hip wadder boots when you start 
> reading the 
> > stuff submitted by the BPL lobbyists. A number of them 
> clearly need to 
> > crack their physics textbooks for a refresher course in physical 
> > reality.
> > 
> > BTW, if you go to the QRZ.com BPL thread, there are a bunch 
> of links 
> > to comments from the various BPL lobby groups:
> > 
> > http://www.qrz.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST&f=3&t=40329
> > 
> > Remember we are in a reply comment period. Your comments
> > must be "in reply" to comments already submitted. There are 
> examples 
> > of proper reply comments at the above link. The deadline is August 
> > 20th.
> > 
> > 73 de Mike, W4EF.................................
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>
> > To: <unlisted-recipients:>; <no To-header on input>
> > Cc: "towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Coax Disconnection AND A BIGGER ISSUE
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >>HAVE ALL OF YOU FILED YOU COMMENTS WITH THE FCC ABOUT THE BPL ISSUE?
> >>
> >>If you are unsure about this topic and want some more background go 
> >>the ARRL site at:
> >>
> >>http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/08/08/2/?nc=1
> >>
> >>then:
> >>
> >>Let the FCC know by flooding their electronic in-box on this matter 
> >>just how bad an idea this is.  It is easy to do - here is 
> how to you 
> >>can stand up and be counted:
> >>
> >>We are in the 21st century - use your computer browser to 
> surf on into 
> >>the FCC site where you will find an opportunity to participate by 
> >>making an entry on the EFCS - Electronic Filing Comment System - in 
> >>moments you can be composing a note to the FCC that tells 
> them what a 
> >>bad idea BPL is!  Click on:
> >>
> >>http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/
> >>
> >>Your on the FCC page, now - in the Upper RH portion of the page you 
> >>will see a button labeled
> >>
> >>Submit A Filing  (click on it)
> >>
> >>This will take you to:
> >>
> >>http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
> >>
> >>Where you submit your comment on the matter...
> >>
> >>The first box is the only difficult one to fill in - the number you 
> >>need for this is:
> >>
> >>03-104
> >>
> >>The balance of the form is easy to fill out, you will be asked easy 
> >>stuff like your name, etc... and then, most important type in your
> >>
> >>COMMENT
> >>
> >>PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING THIS WEEKEND, take a few minutes to go to 
> >>the FCC site, lets act as a group on this and show the FCC that we 
> >>care and will not be QRMed out of existence.
> >>
> >>Do this or you will not have to worry about needing a grounded 
> >>station, the point will be moot!
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", 
> > "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 
> > 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com 
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> > 
> 
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>