Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] N connectors

To: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@gbonline.com>, <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] N connectors
From: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:48:36 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
.As far as power handling,my 800 watt out
> amp for 2 meters came with......SO-239's.All Alphas that I have seen or
> played with have.......SO-239's.Most radios and amps use SO-239's until
you
> get to 432 and even then some have SO-239's on 432.

Just because it has a SO-239 doesn't mean that that's the best connector..
it just means that it's a market accepted standard. If I were marketing
anything to hams, I'd put UHF connectors on it because that's what people
already have installed, and, it's "good enough" for most HF applications.
For things I build for myself, I use BNC, TNC, N, F, and SMA, depending on
the application, and not just because I actually think that constant
impedance connectors are important, but it's because that's what everything
I have has on it. For what it's worth, the RJ-45 used in Cat-5 network
wiring is a far better performer, impedance and matching wise, than most
other common connectors. Can't beat well controlled cross talk and
consistent match up to 350 MHz.

> IMO below 144 Mhz use
> whatever you have,just get on the air.    Gregg  K9KL   Green Bay,WI

I'll vote for that...


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>