Quite true - in fact, my contingency was that I would apply to the HOA
first, and if they did NOT approve the tower installation, the contract
would be null and void. It was interesting how quickly it passed the CCR
review - they would have had two families irritated with them for a sale
falling through. My request to install a 55 foot tower was approved with
little comment.
73,
Joe
WDØM
At 04:39 AM 3/16/2005, Pete Smith wrote:
>It also doesn't hurt (is essential!) to insist on a contingency in the
>contract so that you can be released from it if you make a negative
>discovery late in the process.
>
>73, Pete N4ZR
>
>At 03:43 PM 3/15/2005, Joe - WDØM wrote:
>
>>I agree - its a very unfair statement. Want to buy property in
>>Washington? My brother is a realtor there AND a ham. It certainly is
>>incumbent upon the BUYER to check things out - relying totally on a realtor
>>can be a mistake - I'm sure you wouldn't buy most things that way. I've
>>purchased property all over the US (USAF- Retired) and found realtors to be
>>an honest bunch for the most part - like the rest of society. When it came
>>to putting up antennas, I did my own research, with the realtor's and
>>occasionally county clerk's help.
>>
>>73,
>>Joe
>>WDØM
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|