Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Erections (Tower)

To: "'Dave NØRQ'" <n0rq-lists@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Erections (Tower)
From: "Steve Gehring" <steveg@mtaonline.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:55:12 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I could be mistaken concerning the ARRL Technician video course, but while I
was attending the technician classes with my 13 year old son last year, I
saw one of their crew (during their short tower safety demo) climb an
extended crank-up tower.  Isn't climbing an extended crank-up not
recommended by tower manufacturers because it's a dangerous practice?

At least the crew was wearing their hardhats...

NL7W
 

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dave NØRQ
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:52 PM
To: K8fu@aol.com; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Erections (Tower)

I guess I'll be a nag...

I have a class of 7 kids taking the ARRL Technician video course.
In the Safety Practices section of the course, the instructor
(rightly) makes it very clear that in no way should antennas
be put up where they could contact power lines, should either the
antennas or the power lines fall.

It also would seem that a 100' self-supporter would have very limited
capacity (unless it is a big expensive cell tower or something), and that
any normal ham-class self-supporter of that height would be
severely overloaded with that much antenna at the top.

No offense, and there are certainly details that were not provided,
but it seems to me that these plans need revising.

-- 
Dave NØRQ



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <K8fu@aol.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:50
Subject: [TowerTalk] Erections (Tower)


> GA To All.............................
>
> Am in the process of installing a 100' self supporting steel twr but am
> going to put some guys on it just for my own piece of mind as there are 
> some pwr
> lines abt 60' away.
> I've been able to corral 500' of Polygon cable which will handle the guys 
> @
> 90' but not enough for the set @ 40'. So guess I'll hv to go with steel 
> cable
> on  the bottom.
> Antennas will be a 40m rotable dipole and a 4L SteppIR.
> My question is to whether the bottom set of steel guys need to be broken 
> up
> with insulators as they will be 65' below the SteppIR. TIA for your input.
>
> Froggy                 K8FU
> Forget Secretaries.................Take a Frog to  Lunch.........
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with 
> any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>