Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground
From: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: ve3zi@rac.ca
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:09:24 +0100 (BST)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My experience (admittedly really limited to 160m) is
that it is pretty easy to get ~50% efficiency. It is
pretty hard to get close to 100%.

My justification for saying this is that at one point
I had an inverted L (in a tree) with about a 50'
vertical section fed against a few poor radials. I
also had a 95' top loaded vertical fed against >150
long radials about 400' feet from the inverted L. The
difference between the two was certainly well less
than 6dB. I also had a 300' vertical at my remote site
(about 7 miles away) fed against 120 x 1000' radials.
No great difference between that and the 95' vertical,
although the DX characteristics were a bit different.

Quite depressing really!

73 Roger
VE3ZI



                
___________________________________________________________ 
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday 
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>