Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier for ROHN SSV. Pad and Pier Foundations

To: <isp@bnjcomp.com>, "towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier for ROHN SSV. Pad and Pier Foundations
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 08:24:02 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
At 07:42 AM 7/9/2005, isp@bnjcomp.com wrote:

>Of couse like everyone else here on this list that puts up thier own tower 
>I am trying to save money.  But also trying to stay safe.   The property I 
>am putting this on was originally part of a piece of land that was hopeful 
>that the city would get a large business to be on.  So for that reason 
>they did core samples of the property.  So I am going to try to acquire a 
>copy of the results of those core samples to see what they say.   So my 
>question is I don't see in Rohn's book a spot for "if XXX sandy conditions 
>then modify piers by doing this or that"  or "if XXX compactness with clay 
>then modify piers by doing this or that".

In general, the mfr won't provide this level of detail.  If you're going to 
modify the "standard" installation, especially for a tower costing tens of 
thousands of dollars, they're going to expect that you have an engineer who 
can do the calculations for your local situation.  You have to take into 
account not only the bearing strength of the soil, the details of the 
excavation/compaction method, and local regulatory stuff.  Rohn can't be 
expected to know all the idiosyncracies of every building department and 
soil type.

On the other hand, a local engineer can probably crank this sort of thing 
out, along with all the other structural calculations in 10-20 hours at a 
$100/hr or so, and an engineer's report would probably be required by the 
building department anyway.  That's probably <10% of the cost of the 
overall job, considering the new cost of the tower, the excavation, the 
permitting, etc., especially if you treat it like a business, and you 
actully figure in the cost of labor for digging the holes, etc.



>  Once I get that where do I look for those modifications.  Also I tried 
> when I bought this tower to get engineering drawings from ROHN but after 
> MANY calls was unsuccessful.  Does anyone have any new experience with 
> new radian / rohn and think my ability to get those drawings would be 
> better?  Better question is it seems all the information is in the
>  Rohn Catalog and I am wondering what I will get off of those drawings 
> that is not in the catalog (since the drawings will probable be for the 
> original owners Soil conditions).?

You're talking about engineering drawings prepared for a specific 
installation?  I'm not surprised that you couldn't get a copy. In some 
cases, the drawings remain the property of the engineer/architect who 
prepared them.  In others, they are owned by the person who paid for the 
analysis.

  In any case, the drawings may not be of much use to you in a practical 
sense.  As you say, they would be for a different installation, so you 
couldn't use them for your installation.  They might be interesting to look 
at in an "understanding how the engineering analysis is done" sense, but 
you certainly couldn't just plug in your numbers and hope to trust the 
results.  A lot of times, there's a goodly element of professional 
judgement in the analysis and drawings, and most engineers don't put ALL 
the gotchas into the analysis.  Example: Engineers in San Diego probably 
don't even bother doing the ice loading calculations, or even mentioning 
that they didn't do them.  The local building department isn't looking for 
them, the odds of icing occurring are so small that the engineer can be 
comfortable (in a professional responsibility sense) not mentioning them, etc.

I am certainly leery of people who ask me for copies of drawings I've done, 
and want to know a WHOLE lot about why they want them.  The last thing I'd 
want is someone to photocopy some drawings I've done (without my knowing 
and approving), submit them for their permit, have the counter person not 
worry about it not having an original wetstamp, have a disaster, and find 
out about it when the legal summons shows up in my mailbox.  I'd prevail in 
the long run, but it would be expensive and time consuming.


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>