At 11:51 AM 8/9/2007, Bill Turner wrote:
>After many years of using trap dipoles and individual switched dipoles
>I recently put up a set of three parallel-connected dipoles
>(160/80/40) and was very pleasantly surprised how easily they were to
>tune. I had always shied away from parallel dipoles because of stories
>about serious interaction between them, etc, etc. Not so. It was a
>piece of cake when using a MFJ-259 SWR analyzer.
>
>The point is, I would suggest parallel verticals, 1/4 wl on each band.
>Use one strong central pole for the lowest frequency and hang wires
>from it for the higher bands and spread the wires out a few degrees.
If you can make the pole not look like an antenna (maybe one of those
ship's mast type flag poles with rigging) this is a good way to
go. You need to get the other wires seperated by a few inches to get
good performance.
(And, as Bill says, something like a MFJ259 makes it straightforward
to tune.. it's a nightmare without it..)
>I bet you will also be pleasantly surprised.
>
>Bill W6WRT
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|