Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize

To: john@kk9a.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:04:01 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Tell them there is also an ANSI spec that prohibits voids in the 
galvanizing for structural members.  Ask them to show you that spec and 
convince you they complied with it.  The only one I found online costs 
about $35 but might it be worth buying ...

http://webstore.ansi.org/RecordDetail.aspx?sku=ASTM+A123%2FA123M-02

Why anyone would use a grinder to take off spurs is beyond me anyway.  
Zinc is malleable and a bit of tapping with a hammer would easily knock 
down any sharp spikes or edges without ruining the coverage.  Ask them 
if they've ever heard of burnishing.

73,
Dave  AB7E



john@kk9a.com wrote:
> A short time ago,  I had some tower sections regalvanized.  They were not in 
> bad shape, but I thought I would recoat them before installing the tower, 
> thinking I would have a tower that looked new again.   I had the work done 
> at a local galvanizer and at first glance they look good.  Now they have 
> been sitting outside for several weeks I can see areas of red rust.  After 
> galvanizing, they apparently carelessly used a grinder to remove the spurs 
> and sharp edges and in some areas they ground to the base metal.  I called 
> the galvanizer and he said this is no big deal and to just spray it with 
> zinc enriched paint.  I stated if you didn't grind it there would have been 
> no problem and he stated they are required by an ANSI spec to remove sharp 
> edges.  Nearly all of the rusted areas are on the cross braces and there are 
> only several bad area on each section.  However, since I paid for hot dip 
> galvanizing I am unhappy with just spraying it with paint.  The company is 
> claiming this is standard practice and allowed by ANSI.  I have used 
> galvanizers before without incidence.  Has anyone else had similar 
> experiences?  Does anyone know what the galvanizing specifications are and 
> with is and is not acceptable?  Right now the company is reluctant to 
> correct this problem.
>
> John KK9A 
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>   
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>