Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD

To: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD
From: "Ron Chambers" <rwchambers@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:55:33 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Unless I am nuts I have an email from Cushcraft a few months back where I
quizzed them about that very thing and am 99% sure they said they were the
same.
Will look back.

Ron
N5QQ


On 12/4/07, K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net> wrote:
>
> I counted 66 turns on my XM240 coils.  Maybe that's the reason I had a
> lot of trouble getting it to go low enough in frequency.
>
> I would expect to see some kind of difference, either element length or
> coil turns, between the XM240 and 40-2CD.  That U shaped support channel
> used on the XM240 significantly increases the effective diameter of the
> element, for the length of the channel.
>
> Jerry, K4SAV
>
> Doug Renwick wrote:
>
> >Historically it would be best to replace the self taping SS screw and
> >replace it with a bolt.  I drilled the hole through with a 5/32" bit,
> >and used a 6-32 x 1 1/4" SS bolt and filed the bolt flush to the surface
> >of the nut.  I put a #6 SS flat washer on the coil and a star washer at
> >the nut.
> >
> >On my XM240 coils I counted 67 turns.  Some have reported counting 68
> >turns.  Does anyone know if there was a design change or was this a
> >difference between the 40-2CD and XM240?
> >
> >Doug
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>