Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Radial length

To: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Radial length
From: Larry DiGioia N8KU <towertalk@longwire.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:11:56 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Here is the short version:

1.) radials are the "other half" of your ground-mounted vertical antenna
2.) dirt doesn't make a very good antenna construction material

Jim Brown wrote:
> Certainly a circularly symmetrical radial system is best, but few of us are 
> able to realize it. Mine deviates significantly from that ideal, but the 
> antenna works well.  The best and most readable description I've seen for the 
> function of a radial system is by W2DU, as a chapter of his book 
> "Reflections." It's on his website. Google on w2du to find it. N6LF has 
> written a rather detailed version that's in the Antenna Book, but there are 
> typos in the associated graphics that make it difficult to follow. 
>
> The short answer is that the radial system functions as a return for the 
> currents and the fields associated with the antenna. The lower the resistance 
> of whatever conductors serve this function (including the earth), the closer 
> the antenna comes to full theoretical efficiency. The radial system does NOT 
> function as a reflector for the signal. The earth at significantly greater 
> distance from the antenna serves that function. 
>
> I have seen many references in the literature to the effect that NEC is not 
> very good at modeling ground losses and the effect of radial systems. Count 
> me among those who 1) consider real measurement of one radial system compared 
> to a reference antenna as the only meaningful predictor; 2) consider soil 
> conditions at any given location to be an influence on how many radials it 
> takes to get there; and 3) consider Tom's advice, and the advice in the 
> Antenna Book to be solid as a rock. 
>
> 73,
>
> Jim Brown K9YC
>
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:23:26 -0400, Robert Carroll wrote:
>
>   
>> On the other hand if I were
>> only trying to provide a low loss ground return, I might route the radials
>> for convenience in avoid things like a garden, a pool, or some other object.
>> Which view is the correct one?
>>     
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>   

-- 
Larry  N8KU

 l o n g w i r e . c o m
 HF - DX - CW - Digital

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>