Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] wire antenna question

To: Blair S Balden <blair.balden@wmich.edu>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] wire antenna question
From: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:12:53 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Blair,

If you do a Google search on "Smith Chart", you will find many  
resources about this useful tool to graphically display impedance and  
how a match can be achieved.  Chapter 28 of my copy of the ARRL  
Antenna Book (19th Edition) is devoted to this topic.

73,
Bob N7XY

On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Blair S Balden wrote:

> Well, I suppose my understanding was not quite right.  I had  
> assumed that, if you could get the load impedance to a value of 50  
> ohms (when using 50-ohm coax), you would get a 1:1 SWR.  I thought  
> this is how antenna tuners and matching networks worked, by  
> inserting the appropriate amount and type of reactance to arrive at  
> 50 ohms, or as close to it as possible.
>
> I had reasoned that if my resonant dipole had an impedance of less  
> than 50 ohms, with the resulting SWR, I could reduce the SWR by  
> changing the length, thereby "unbalancing" the reactive component  
> and raising the total impedance to 50 ohms.
>
> Apparently, I need to study this further.
>
> Thanks to all who commented.
>
> 73,
> Blair NP2F
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Date: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:46 pm
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] wire antenna question
>
>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:37:41 +0000, Steve Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> Minimum VSWR:  Freq = 21.03 MHz, Z = 101.1 - j16.64, VSWR = 2.09
>>> Resonance: Freq = 21.13 MHz, zZ= 112.2+j0, VSWR = 2.25
>>
>>> The "anomaly" occurs because the VSWR is being  referenced to
>> something
>>> significantly different than the resonant impedance of the antenna;
>>
>> Here's yet another situation where 75 ohm coax would be a better
>> choice than 50
>> ohm coax.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jim K9YC
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>